By Kathleen
Sayce
When
civil engineers, architects and planners design buildings, roads,
bridges, levees, dams, drainage canals and other structures, they use
the principle of stationarity to decide how high, how strong, how
wind resistant, this structure has to be to withstand a typical
50-year, 100-year, 500-year or 1000-year event.
All
construction balances on a line between built 'strong enough' and
'over-built too much' to keep the cost as low as possible. The
stationarity principle has historically ensured that the structure
will last for its planned life, which may be anywhere from twenty
years to several hundred years.
To
settle on the event standards to design to, professionals refer back
to applicable weather metrics and disaster occurrence histories,
including high and low temperatures, rainfall, stream flows, floods,
snow falls, wind storms, tornadoes, droughts, and earthquakes.
One of
the reasons modern cultures measure weather events is to provide
metrics for infrastructure and building designers, planners and
insurance agents. Building codes also emerged, to set minimum
standards that ensure a building will not flood, catch fire or blow
down during normal events, and will stay in good condition for its
design life.
Several
years ago a national science magazine ran an editorial which stated
that the concept of stationarity was dead [I did not think of this
title, I borrowed it from that article]. The authors are engineers,
who explained that when a river community had three thousand-year
flood events in five years, it was time to redefine a
one-thousand-year event. That it was past time to reevaluate
appropriate event standards with a new, broader measure of caution.
Five percent (higher, wider, stronger) might not be enough anymore.
Twenty-five percent might be better, or in some instances, fifty
percent. [1 February 2008, P.D.C Milly et al, access via
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/319/5863/573.short]
Change
goes on around us all the time, both in our culture and in the
natural world. In the past three decades, local air temperature
measurements changed. Plant growing zones are defined by winter low
temperatures, and have been shifting steadily warmer for many
locations. Fifty years ago, the South Coast of Washington was defined
as a region 7 growing area, with winter low temperatures between 0
and 10° F. Today this same geographic area is considered zone 8,
with lows between 10 and 20 °F. Similar changes have happened for
many areas.
Along
with warming winter temperatures, we’ve seen higher summer
temperatures. In 2012, in just one hot spell, over one thousand high
temperature records were broken in the Midwest. Many locations set
new records day after day, until the heat wave finally quit. New
records for consecutive days over 100 °F were also set.
If you
are an engineer working on cooling systems, you have to design for
increased cooling capacity. Otherwise, the cooling system will never
work properly. Ditto on insulation and heating standards, stormwater,
and roof snow loads.
The
Astoria-Megler Bridge was designed in the 1960s. At the time, the
design standards based on then-current stationarity guidelines looked
pretty good. But now, knowing about local earthquakes and tsunamis,
with ships four to five times larger and ten times heavier, with
longer, heavier commercial trucks, and heavier passenger vehicles,
the bridge is woefully under-designed. A new bridge in this location
today would be designed to a new standard.
No one
thinks this bridge is in eminent danger of collapse––that is not
the point. The point is that data about traffic loads, weather
extremes, wind loading, and seismic events has changed. The degree of
uncertainty about event severity that can be expected has also
changed. Stationarity has changed.
For a
house, this means more insulation, stronger framing, a tougher roof,
a higher foundation or a location on higher ground. For a road
crossing a river, it may mean a larger culvert or stronger, higher
bridge, along with higher road levels and deeper ditches to each
side. For a stormwater system, it means more capacity.
Last
winter, a rain burst in the west Willapa Hills flooded South Bend,
overloaded culverts that drained west to the bay from there south to
Naselle, and blew out a culvert on Peter's Creek in Naselle, taking
out a section of Highway 4. Part of the flooding was due to blockages
in culverts, and part to culverts that were faced with water flows
well beyond their design capacity.
The
culvert that formerly ran under Highway 4 will be replaced with an
open box culvert, which means that there will now be a small bridge
where there once was a corrugated pipe. Engineers are designing it
now. In South Bend, storm drains were cleaned out, and their capacity
will probably be reviewed.
A change
in stationarity means, when constructing anything––a road, a
culvert or bridge, a home, or other structures––it's time to let
go of thinking that we know what might happen based on the past, and
design instead for the next increment stronger, windier, colder,
hotter, wetter, to be appropriate for that structure and location.
The problem with our time is that the weather is not what it used to
be, and our old stationarity standards need to be reset.
No comments:
Post a Comment